Class action lawsuit alleges AMD’s Bulldozer CPUs aren’t really 8-core processors - starkuplithim98

Gordon Mah Ung

AMD is in the hot induct again. This time it's not about company earnings, but AMD's selling claims about the power of its Bulldozer C.P.U. platform. In late October, 1 disappointed AMD buyer filed a class action lawsuit arguing that AMD's statements about Bulldozer supporting ahead to eight cores were false.

Tony Dickey, a resident physician of Alabama WHO brought the causa against the companion, says AMD's actions violate the consumer assemblage remedies act, California's unfair competition police, false ad, pseud, breach of express warranty, delinquent misrepresentation, and unrighteous enrichment.

At issue is how Dozer CPU cores work. AMD takes 2 cores and packs them into a single package called a faculty. The problem is that these cardinal cores inside a faculty cannot operate independently, according to the suit. Thus, an 8-core Bulldozer CPU effectively has quaternity cores since the eight cores cannot work happening eight instructions severally and at the Lapp time, the suit alleges.

"AMD tricked consumers into buying its Bulldozer processors by overstating the number of cores contained in the Bulldozer chips," reported to the charge. "Normal consumers in the market for computer CPUs miss the requisite technical expertise to understand the design of [AMD's] processors, and trusts [AMD] to channel accurate specifications regarding its CPUs."

Although the causa was filed in late October IT only of late came to light. AMD was unavailable for comment at this penning.

Wherefore this matters: The functionality of AMD's CPUs is a critical issuance for many Personal computer enthusiasts so much as gamers Oregon anyone requiring a large amount of calculation power in their desktop rig. Whether Impaired's claims will survive a legal dispute, however, is unclear. Joel Hruska over at ExtremeTech isn't buying the claim that AMD's 8-core processors perform like a musculus quadriceps femoris-core CPU, saying it's "utterly without subject field merit." That internet site's testing shows that multi-rib applications scale up in performance as more Dozer C.P.U. cores are used. PCWorld's look at Bulldozer's public presentation when information technology first came prohibited in 2011 found that AMD's eight-core FX-8150 performed comparably to Intel's quad-core i5-2500K while requiring more than power.

The claim against AMD comes clean Eastern Samoa the companion is getting ready to transition from Bulldozer towards its upcoming Zen CPU platform in 2016. Ze promises known improvements over Bulldozer including Coincident Multithreading, which is similar to Intel's Hyperthreading. Zen will also offer a 40 percent melioration in operation concluded Bulldozer, AMD claims.

[via LegaNewsline]

Note: When you purchase something after clicking links in our articles, we may earn a small commission. Read our assort data link policy for more details.

Ian is an independent author based in Israel who has ne'er met a tech content he didn't like. He primarily covers Windows, PC and gaming hardware, video and music streaming services, mixer networks, and browsers. When he's not covering the news he's working on how-to tips for PC users, or tuning his eGPU apparatus.